Supreme Court - Criminal Section V - Judgement of 22 October to 22 November 2010 # 41142
father who commit acts of violence on the mother responds to the offense of child maltreatment. The judges of the Supreme Court imposing an exemplary sentence for violence against the partner and the couple's children, out of a man in front of children both verbally and physically assaulted their mother. Behavior which prompted the son's refusal to go to school for fear that during his absence his mother was beaten that he could not do anything to defend it, while the daughter had begun to suffer from bulimia. Stoats reject the thesis that denied the defense the existence of a causal link between the disease that had manifested itself in the child and the father's violent attitude towards his partner, who was considered the sole recipient of the outbursts of his companion. The Supreme Court rejected the reading "compartmentalized" because of what happened in the family, insisting instead on the state of children suffering as a direct cause of his father's rampage. The oppressive measures imposed attitudes to children - says the College - inevitably create a climate of unease, even if they are not directly facing children who witness the violence. The offense of abuse - even specify stoats - configure not only in the presence of behavior active, but must also be put in place as is the omission of the parent who does not care about education and care for their children. In the case examined by the Court of Cassation, the applicant was the mother went so far as threatening to kill their children. This in the presence of children.
- for further information on the thematic area of \u200b\u200bfamily law visit: Separation, Divorce and Family
- for further information on the thematic area of \u200b\u200bfamily law visit: Separation, Divorce and Family
0 comments:
Post a Comment